1. Welcome to 28DaysLater.co.uk - 28DL - The UK Urban Exploring / Urban Exploration / Urbex Forums.

    Asylums and Hospitals, High Stuff, Industrial, Leisure Sites, Residential Sites, Military Sites, Mines and Quarries, ROC Posts, Theatres and Cinemas, Draining, Underground Sites, European and International Sites, Leads, Rumours and News, Kit, Clothing, Equipment, Photography and Video sections plus a lot more.

    Please feel free to browse this website as a guest. Creating an account removes some ads, allows you to post replies, start new topics and threads, and gives you access to more features including bookmarking, live chat, messaging and notification systems.

    Create an account | Login | Request new password

Report - Brighton Road Industrial Estate, Stockport, September 2015

Discussion in 'Industrial Sites' started by Alley, Oct 2, 2015.

  1. Alley

    Alley Conspicuous Loiterer
    Regular User

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    145
    The soot-stained old factory on Brighton Road is a noticeable local landmark. This large collection of buildings, with its short, octagonal chimney and distinctive saw-toothed rooftops, visible from the M60 in Stockport, had been in the back of my mind for some time. On map websites, it looked like an active site. Recently, I decided to pop in and ask for permission to take photos of the chimney. Then, driving past, I noticed that demolition had started. Oh no! Would I be too late?

    I went down the next evening to find that nothing had changed, there was no demolition equipment on the sealed off site, and it looked completely abandoned. Result. That weekend, early on a clear, sunny morning, FreshFingers and I slipped in unnoticed and beheld the expanse of buildings with excited anticipation.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Built in the late 1800s this was originally Silver Spoon (Pan) Fruit Processing Works, then in the 1920s was Faulders’ Cocoa and Chocolate Works. By the 1930s it was Squirrel Chocolate Works and in 1960s became a distribution depot for Cadbury’s. A friend remembers playing among the pallets of the 'chocolate factory' in the 1950s. Later it was occupied by small businesses. The works comprises a large rectangular block with sawtooth roof, and central entrance house with tall chimney. The adjacent rail line, built in 1880, branched into the site.

    [​IMG]

    We spent four hours exploring the different buildings. It has been used by various businesses, all leaving behind remnants of their work. First, the ground floor – most recently used by a window retailer. It has brick arch ceilings, supported by iron beams and pillars. Part of the largest room was undergoing asbestos decontamination. We didn't go into the sealed off bit.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Some lovely pillars

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    The top floor used to be The Greenhouse Recording Studio. Lots of rooms with carpeted walls.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Out back we found what looked to be a shipping container. Why was it painted in camo colours? Not sure what it was for, but I want to live in it.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Now, the best bit. Let's go downstairs.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Into the chimney

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Up to the entrance house

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Back in 2013 plans were submitted for redevelopment of this site, into a retail park. These met with local objection: residents don't want the increased traffic, and say the area doesn't need yet another supermarket. They claimed that development “contravenes the Stockport local plan on use class for the development site”.

    A Heritage Statement was prepared back in 2013. This is a study which assesses the 'value' of a site of potential historic interest, working within the parameters laid out by the local council and the new National Planning Policy Framework. Paragraph 128 of the NPPF states “local planning authorities should require an applicant to describe the significance of any heritage assets affected, including any contribution made by their setting.”

    The study then goes on to not describe the contribution made by the site's setting, just to advocate for its demolition. I think this is the important bit: “The former industrial buildings on the application site are not designated heritage assets [maybe the chimney should be designated?] and have not been formally identified by the local authority as non-designated heritage assets. The extant chimney has been identified by the local authority during pre- application requirements as being of potential merit and this report has therefore been prepared to provide a more detailed understanding of the former works and any significance it may possess.”

    The report goes on to conclude that the chimney is not of merit and can therefore be demolished. I disagree. Let's look at what they say:

    “information provided by BSCP Consulting Engineers indicates that due to general deterioration of the buildings on the site, the chimney brickwork is also likely to have suffered from frost and weather action.”

    In other words, they didn't check the chimney. I know they didn't because it is not safely accessible to surveyors, and, being sheltered by the buildings, is actually in really good condition. As you can see from the photos, the base brickwork is dry and undamaged. It's a perfectly sturdy little chimney and they're trying to bullshit the council into letting them knock it down.

    Chimney to the left, entrance house ahead, external wall to the right.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    “The HER record makes reference to an ‘octagonal chimney with a decorative cap’. This is no longer the case and the chimney is now plain with no architectural adornment or embellishment. Indeed, the H. Faulder and Co Ltd letterhead from the early days of the company contains an illustration of the chimney and it appears to have always been a simple functional structure with no decorative cap.”

    So, it's never been a decorative chimney. That's not the point – Stockport was a mill town. At its peak there were 129 chimneys in this small valley. There are five left, including this one, in the town centre. I believe all chimneys should be saved as a reminder of the town's past. They also add interest and character.

    The survey names some remaining (and considered important) chimneys: Decorative: Pear Mill; Meadow Mill; Houldsworth Mill. Plain round: Wellington Mill. Only the latter is actually visible from Stockport town centre. Not mentioned is Welkin (Ark) Mill which has a nice round chimney, a landmark by the M60 at Bredbury. Brighton Road chimney sits high above the motorway, a more appropriate and attractive gatepost to Stockport from the West than the ugly pyramid.

    “underlying the scheme proposals is an aspiration to enhance the existing areas and create a bespoke landmark development, including enhanced landscaping areas and new external features... with larger buildings located to the west, consistent with the historic arrangement of built development...the loss of buildings of low significance must be balanced with the overall benefits that will accrue from redevelopment of the site....”

    So, we can keep the chimney then?
    If you're concerned about Stockport heritage, feel free to emither our local heritage councillor paulhartley@stockport.gov.uk

    Obviously development of some form will inevitably go ahead but it would be nice if the council ensured that it retained the character of the site. If it must be a retail park, or even apartments, how about cleaning up the chimney as a centrepiece and calling it Silver Pan Park, or even The Chocolate Factory?
     
    #1 Alley, Oct 2, 2015
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2015
    ThisWay, sherbetdab, toby and 7 others like this.

    Remove this ad by donating or subscribing.

  2. scotty markfour

    scotty markfour 28DL Regular User
    Regular User

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    469
    Likes Received:
    305
    what an excellent report n pics , must check this site out for myself @Alley ......well done !
     
    Alley likes this.
  3. clebby

    clebby ( . Y . )
    Regular User

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2008
    Messages:
    591
    Likes Received:
    474
    Great stuff, this has dweeb written all over it
     
    Alley likes this.
  4. slayaaaa

    slayaaaa 28DL Regular User
    Regular User

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    1,136
    Likes Received:
    607
    Love it, especially like the arguement you've put forward r.e. the Chimney, I completley agree and I hope it's retained and saved. Maybe start up an EPetition or something simular?

    Lovely pictures :)
     
    Alley likes this.
  5. scotty markfour

    scotty markfour 28DL Regular User
    Regular User

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    469
    Likes Received:
    305
    is this place being prepared for demolition ? or is it still council bullshit talk at the moment ?
     
  6. Alley

    Alley Conspicuous Loiterer
    Regular User

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    145
    Demolition has definitely started, the first picture shows that the front of the building has gone. I don't know when that was done.
     
    scotty markfour likes this.
  7. scotty markfour

    scotty markfour 28DL Regular User
    Regular User

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    469
    Likes Received:
    305
    cheers @Alley ,saves me a wasted journey !
     
  8. scotty markfour

    scotty markfour 28DL Regular User
    Regular User

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    469
    Likes Received:
    305
    then again its only twenty miles away ! so i,d better check it out or i will regret it for ever !
     
  9. host

    host 28DL Regular User
    Regular User

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2009
    Messages:
    801
    Likes Received:
    224
    Excellent report, your reports are always so well put together and have so much history i wish we could see more from you..i've driven past this many times and never really bothered with it, what a slacker.
     
    Alley likes this.
  10. Camera Shy

    Camera Shy Old enough to know better
    Regular User

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2011
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    683
    It's been in this state for a while now, demo seems to have stalled, i went in here a few weeks ago and was disappointed with it, you've made it look rather more interesting with some excellent history.
     
    Alley and scotty markfour like this.
  11. Keynsham

    Keynsham 28DL Full Member
    28DL Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    14
    Good luck with preserving the chimney. Have you spoken to English Heritage?
     
    Alley likes this.
  12. toby

    toby Armchair warrior
    28DL Full Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2010
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    7
    Superb report Alley
     
    Alley likes this.
  13. Alley

    Alley Conspicuous Loiterer
    Regular User

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    145
    Not sure if they can do anything if it isn't yet listed. I will be making enquiries this week.

    Cheers for all the comments :thumb
     
  14. stranton

    stranton subterranean explorer
    Regular User

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,289
    Likes Received:
    592
    nice stuff :thumb
     
    Alley likes this.
  15. Nickindroy

    Nickindroy A Porky Prime Cut
    Regular User

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2012
    Messages:
    848
    Likes Received:
    324
    No one tells it like you do, wonderful.
     
    Alley likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted
Loading...

Users Who Have Read This Thread (Total: 0)

Share This Page

Remove this ad by creating an account and logging in