Web
Analytics
Lead or Rumour info - - Droitwich - Willow court Farmhouse? | Leads, Rumours and News... | 28DaysLater.co.uk

Lead or Rumour info - Droitwich - Willow court Farmhouse?


Ya Boy Croy

28DL Full Member
28DL Full Member
This place is on the outskirts of Droitwich and is also known as "Boycott Farm". It may not even be worth the venture out, I just know trying to get into this place just before the second lockdown, and was unsuccessful, after having a google for some of the history of the place it seems to have quite the history, I would've never guessed this from the state of the place!

Some of the history being.. (This is mostly copied and pasted unfortunately)

Boycott Farm took on some interesting and engaging directions. The first, remarkably early mention comes from a court hearing in 1275 – part of the Worcester Eyre (a series of court cases heard by visiting royal judges) – which records a dispute over ownership of rents held in Droitwich and Boycott by one William Bachecot. His tenant, Simon Aleyn, had been paying a lease of ½ pence a year to William Jordan, though the court found their contract was invalid due to William Jordan being underage when it was agreed. William Bachecot was declared the true landowner and Simon Aleyn ordered to pay rent of 16 shillings to him (Röhrkasten 2008).

In 1456, a “messuage in the Overboycote” (messuage meaning a dwelling) is mentioned. This reference comes from a document describing Droitwich’s boundaries, which then ran immediately south of the present farm’s location to “Boycotebridge”.
There is a 13th century reference to Boycott – the name – but the building is probably 16th century.
The surviving farm buildings have 16th century elements, but no historical records relating to its early history are known until the 18th century. The earliest documentation is from 1714, when the property is apparently within the estate of the Talbot family, based at Salwarpe Court. The Salwarpe estate was bought by the Talbots in 1546 – previously it had been in the ownership of Catherine of Aragon, giving Salwarpe a tantalising Royal link.

In 1712, Salwarpe manor was detailed for sale in order to pay Sir John Talbot’s debts. It was taken on by his grandson, John Ivory Talbot, who in turn sold some of the estate’s property, of which Boycott is presumably part, to a Jane Woodhouse in 1718. Boycott went through sale twice in the subsequent years of the 18th century, eventually being transferred in 1784 to Edward Bearcroft, a notorious figure within the history of Droitwich.

In his early years, Edward Bearcroft appears in Bristol assizes (court) records charged with the murder of his own son, who was born out of wedlock – it is rumoured his mother parted with a large sum of money for dropping the charges. Edward Bearcroft was equally colourful in his role as landowner and agent. By making verbal agreements with tenants that could be easily reneged on, he put them in a precarious position and made it difficult for them to challenge him. He changed the expiry day of tenancies from Lady Day (25th March) to Candlemas (2nd February) and moved fields from one farm to another, making it difficult to calculate and compare income. He also failed to pay bills and involved his brother-in-law in various lawsuits with creditors (historicdroitwich 2018).

Perhaps unsurprisingly, when Edward Bearcroft died in 1793 his only mourners are thought to have been his servants. Edward himself appears to have had a different notion of his standing though, as in an addition to his will he states: “My Tenants the Farmers (are) to be my pall bearers with scarfs and hatbands and all the rest of my Tenants & Cottagers to be asked to my Funeral and to have hatbands and gloves for as they are my very best friends and they are entitled to my last respect” (historicdroitwich 2018).

The main beneficiary of his estate was Frances Dickenson, his niece, who is named as the owner of Boycott Farm on an 1812 map. She leases the farm to a Thomas Saunders for £450 in 1815, after which time we have a comprehensive list of tenants until 1939.

Just 7 years later in 1821, Sir John Pakington of the nearby Westwood House paid £5250 to buy the Boycott estate, plus a further £450; presumably to discharge a mortgage raised by Thomas Saunders. The farm stayed within the ownership of the Pakington family into the 20th century.

Under them the farm initially went through several tenants in quick succession, with a William Perry farming 81 acres from Boycott Farm in 1839, then by 1841 a Henry Leach was registered there. From 1851 until at least 1939, the tenancy of the farm was held by the Terry family, beginning with Elizabeth Terry who had a young family at the time. The status of the farm during the mid-19th century is clearly shown by the presence of a waggoner, cowman, housekeeper and house servant. The 1851 census records John Terry as the farmer at Boycott with no mention of Elizabeth, though her children remain. Elizabeth’s son, also called John, took over the farm by 1901 and in turn passed it to his son Arthur by 1939. It is likely that Arthur’s son, also called Arthur, took over some of the farm duties, but we nothing of them after this time until their deaths are registered in the mid and late 20th century. If you are a member of the Terry family, or know of them, and can complete this picture we would be glad to hear from you.

By 1974 the farm was acquired as part of a redevelopment, which was initially known as the Boycott Estate and later renamed as the Westlands Estate. The house was split into flats for five families up until 1994, after which the building remained empty.

How it originally looked.

1623352733590.png


Compared to now...
1623352854696.png


If anyone is curious of the inside, it's some kind of a shit hole to put it nice...

If anyone needs help finding this place, don't mind releasing it due to I am not sure there are any "clear entrances".
 

chills

• Chief Noob Wrangler •
Regular User
Nice amount of history but certainly doesn’t look worth entering in my eyes after watching the video from the trust who now own and are looking to protect it, doubt you’d even see the first floor let alone much of the ground. Equally, if it’s under trust protection they don’t usually leave doors wide open, think this may be a miss and no go I’m afraid.
 

Ya Boy Croy

28DL Full Member
28DL Full Member
Nice amount of history but certainly doesn’t look worth entering in my eyes after watching the video from the trust who now own and are looking to protect it, doubt you’d even see the first floor let alone much of the ground. Equally, if it’s under trust protection they don’t usually leave doors wide open, think this may be a miss and no go I’m afraid.
I was thinking the same, I thought I'd give a post about it since it was technically a failed attempt on my half. Some very nice history behind it, although I never expected it!
 

Similar threads


Top