They did an article on me:
http://www.chad.co.uk/news/39Urban-explorer39-explains-reasons-behind.5214442.jp
http://www.chad.co.uk/news/39Urban-explorer39-explains-reasons-behind.5214442.jp
Welcome to 28DaysLater.co.uk - 28DL - The UK Urban Exploring / Urban Exploration / Urbex Forums. Create an account | Login | Request new password
But yesterday site owner, Nottingham-based businessman M.H. Adam urged all urban explorers to stay away.
"Like all building and development sites the site and building are very dangerous and no one should enter whatsoever. Anyone who does enter will be prosecuted.
"Before alterations, we do ourselves photograph both the building and the site in order to preserve a historic record."
And a spokesman for Nottinghamshire Police says officers are aware of the activities of urban explorers and some trespassers had been issued warning letters and told not to return to the buildings.
Not true, did they put anything like that in my guardian article? No!Please note: They are legally obliged to print the last bit.
Rubbish, they can write whatever they want. It's just they haven't got the balls to be seen to be supporting you 100%.Please note: They are legally obliged to print the last bit.
"...and some trespassers had been issued warning letters and told not to return to the buildings. "
Its Mansfield, what do you expect :tumbleweedmansfield chad, what sort of name is that!