I think we should avoid people nominating their own reports to go in really . A few weird ones have snuck in already that don't seem to fit the definition.
Its supposed to be for reports of really exceptional stuff or exploring, old 'first' reports from places that became really popular or well known (battersea for example) or reports that are a bit special or have had loads of effort put in (Dweebs mill one there even tho he did nominate it himself )
I don't see why things like earls court are particularly noteworthy.
I don't see why people can't nominate their own reports to be honest. Why do you think that, out of interest?
We all have different interpretations and preferences over what is exceptional too, don't we? So it open to debate about what is 'noteworthy' and what is not, I guess.