real time web analytics
Report (Permission Visit) - FORT HORSTED march 23 | Military Sites | 28DaysLater.co.uk

Report (Permission Visit) FORT HORSTED march 23

Hide this ad by donating or subscribing !

Exploring With Pride 🌈

Exploring with pride in more ways than one
28DL Full Member
During the mid 1800s there was considerable alarm in the United Kingdom generated by the territorial ambitions of Emperor Napoleon III of France, a traditional enemy, and the growing power of imperial Germany. The threat was so great that a Royal Commission was set up in 1859 to review UK defences and report its findings to parliament, which it did in 1860.
One of its recommendations was the construction of five forts to provide defence to Chatham’s Eastern flank and the strategically important Chatham dockyard where the new iron-clad warships were to be constructed. The forts were: Darland, Twydall, Luton, Horsted and Bridgewoods. Military opinion on the usefulness of fixed fortifications was divided possibly leading to the forts becoming known as Palmerston’s follies after the Prime Minister of the day Lord Palmerston.
Construction
Work started on Fort Horsted, named after the area and by far the largest of the five, in 1880 using a convict labour force from the newly constructed Borstal prison and supervised by the Royal Engineers. The central tunnel and casemates were the first features to be constructed using bricks laid on timber formers and then covered in concrete to a depth of several metres. If you look at the roof of the main tunnel you can see the impression left by the timber formers. The last feature was the thirty foot deep dry moat that completely encircles the Fort. The chalk and flint from this major excavation was piled on top of the concrete to provide further protection from bombardment. By 1889 the work on the Fort had been completed and its role of providing a garrison, munitions store and water supply top up to Forts Luton and Bridgewoods began.
Armoury
Constructed in the shape of a six sided arrow head, with each flank protected by machines guns in the counterscarp galleries, the Fort would have been home to a garrison of approximately 400 men and women. Although never permanently so, a fort of this size would have been armed with:
Eight 8” Howitzers on recoilless carriages
Four 6.6” Howitzers
Twelve 20-pounder rifled breech loading guns
Thirteen 64-pounder rifled muzzle loading guns
Twelve 32-pounder smooth bore breech loading guns
The guns would have been supplied from ten expense magazines spread around the Fort equipped with hoists feeding munitions to the serving rooms directly above. Most of the guns were movable and could be deployed anywhere around or outside the Fort it enabling a field of fire to protect Chatham’s entire Eastern flank. The style of warfare at the time was for high angle artillery shells to be fired at targets from long range (one to three miles) while close quarter combat relied on sappers digging tunnels under defences and setting off mines. Fort Horsted lies approximately three miles away from the principle target of Chatham dockyard meaning invaders would have to get through the ring to attack the target.
Attacked!
The ring of Forts was put to the test on the 1st July 1907 when 2500 officers and men (the blue army) attacked a much smaller force of 1000 defenders (the red army) to take the dockyard. Since this was a peacetime operation, no shots or artillery were exchanged and both armies relied on the traditional methods of mining, countermining and explosives. The red army concentrated on attacking Forts Luton and Bridgewoods both of which had β€˜fallen’ by August 2nd, proving that the Forts were not impregnable but could severely delay an attacking force.
WW1 & WW2
For the next 60 years the Fort remained in military hands with a small garrison from the Royal Ordnance Corps and latterly the Royal Artillery in continuous occupation. Although much of their activities during this time is still covered by the official secrets act it is known that the Fort was used to manufacture and store ammunition.
During WW2 a light anti-aircraft emplacement comprising 3.7” and Bofors guns were installed and controlled from Fort Luton. On the 15th September 1940, at the height of the Battle for Britain, an observer reported sighting six enemy aircraft being shot down in a 20 minute period. By the early sixties, however, the military no longer had any use for Fort Horsted and it was sold for Β£10,000 to a development company in 1963.
The unloved years
During the next 34 years the Fort had a variety of owners and tenants including Kent County Council, Ford UK, Boxwell Developments, the Biber Group, The Rootes Group, the Rochester Motor Company and Fort Tyres. Milestone dates were 1972 and 1976. In 1972 an application was made to demolish the Fort and build 120 private homes. A two day public enquiry was held and Geoffrey Rippon, Secretary of State for the Environment, stated that Fort Horsted was an ancient monument of great local interest and the application was denied.
By 1976 the Fort was owned by All Tyres or Fort Tyres a company registered in Germany that ran a number of businesses one of which was tyre remoulding. At some point an estimated 100,000 tyres were dumped on top of the site, in the tunnels and completely filled the moat.
The great fire
At midday on Wednesday July 7th 1976 an enormous fire broke out, probably as a result of a grass fire and burned for weeks. At the peak of the blaze over 50 fire fighters were on the scene, traffic diverted and the local college evacuated. After the blaze, the owners continued trading but the gradual decline of the Fort accelerated. Vegetation was allowed to grow unchecked throughout the site, units fell into disrepair, car breaking businesses moved in and the Fort became a regular haunt for the local constabulary seeking information on missing vehicles.
Rescue
By the early 1990s the Fort was all but deserted, derelict and in much need of attention. English Heritage and the Environment Agency issued an enforcement notice on the legal owners with a Β£1,000,000 liability to clear up the site and remove all the tyres. Instead, the owners put up the Fort for auction and it was bought by Avondale Environmental Services Ltd in 1997.
Having decided that the future for this historic monument lay in it being able to sustain itself in terms of income generation and investment, a business plan was put to English Heritage and the Environment Agency to not only clear the site but also to develop it into small business units. By staying within government guidelines for the restoration and renovation of historic sites and keeping all works in character, English Heritage relaxed its normally strict rules and considered relatively modern proposals.
English Heritage continued to support Avondale during the next four years as it cleared the tyres and put the Fort back to a habitable condition. Avondale was finally able to occupy the Fort in August 2001 and begin the next chapter in its long life.
Business Centre
On April 26th 2007, Phase One of Fort Horsted Business Centre was officially opened for business.

An explore we have wanted to do for a while, our mate messaged us the night before to inform us that 2 people had to cancel and asked us if we were interested in joining them so we leapt on chance to see inside we could tell it would be a good explore when we was met by a big gun in the car park lol

AAD8FBC2-7465-4722-AD33-D6B1CBBB9166.jpeg


680F1AA7-742A-42B1-BD9F-0320382304E9.jpeg
the entrance was fairly impressive and rather grand looking i imagine driving a car or van through there would be nerve racking with the narrow side tunnels we did watch a car drive through one barley hesitating i could see my husband doing it at 5mhp πŸ˜‚
945FF6E9-0DEF-40E8-A00C-447945B92605.jpeg


EF0B1C18-EAF4-415F-9ED4-F8EF88F247C7.jpeg


522D405F-AB8A-47E6-9EFB-0D0A36EB6C61.jpeg


111CF2C8-D73C-4266-8E4A-5A8447FBBAC0.jpeg
after watching a short video and being told about the site we were free to roam around the site
EF97B6F0-9602-4242-8998-15C0351561EB.jpeg
C6C7D01A-A1FC-426E-8B1C-C85AC60DA4BF.jpeg
some amazing original graffiti inside took at least 40 pics This one was my favourite what looks to be the skyline of a town with search lights aimed at either a zeppelin or barrage balloon
F7A1D6AE-1847-46A7-8A9E-C947652FC4A0.jpeg
there were also alot of risky ones there too πŸ˜‚
5FC2E6FA-7E1B-4100-BC84-BAC0FCED6776.jpeg
and a sailor with ide asume a prostitute πŸ˜‚
E7F39C40-5B5E-49A9-B174-0B71A9155902.jpeg
a rare Bedford truck rail variant equipped with its own turn table, speaking to the owners it was in process of being sold to a museum but then covid happened there hoping it can still end up in a museum
29F7D9D1-D850-49D5-BBDA-E543C68BCCF7.jpeg
passageway leading under the mote to firing positions so many stairs πŸ™„πŸ˜‚
A768ED5E-5CB9-4BD7-8C05-32655323CD5E.jpeg


3CE087B5-DD1F-4E67-8F03-A287454295AC.jpeg
views from on top and few aa guns and artillery
4270859C-4A43-43E7-9754-8BFA176C8699.jpeg


F8B0855D-BA81-42A7-8F15-A460054E32CA.jpeg


8FE288EB-5EE4-4A0F-AAA2-AFD0B771887A.jpeg
original loos didn't look to inviting πŸ˜‚ they had some weird hopper like things on the back of them haven't seen them before I thought possibly some sort of sand would despence from them into the original loo buckets maybe to absorb odour? If anyone knows let me know
55265955-1FC0-48CB-BB17-9AD7D3AE9DBB.jpeg


A697A93C-DEB2-40E9-9821-E042395C0A26.jpeg
lastly we walked part of the mote although it was rather boggy
90F827D5-132D-4FB4-9F31-01A70C7DFEF5.jpeg
one of the firing positions the tunnels from the fort lead to
2BC5C7AA-5FDA-49C3-A75C-56527F3AB19B.jpeg
thanks for looking hears a fairwell pic πŸ˜‚
D5AC81D8-37F6-4394-AA49-3C12A17763DF.jpeg


273E2303-A581-4F7B-9133-FAE854D79F66.jpeg
 

Calamity Jane

i see beauty in the unloved, places & things
Regular User
Did they let you down to the chamber where there is really old writings? Ive been down there. I have some photos somewhere if you didnt see it?
 

Who has read this thread (Total: 154) View details

Top