real time web analytics
Report - - RAF Harrington, Northants, May 2017 | Military Sites | 28DaysLater.co.uk

Report - RAF Harrington, Northants, May 2017

Hide this ad by donating or subscribing !

A man called Martyn

28DL Full Member
28DL Full Member
Post WW2 and Cold war history from the Harrington museum website

In those days the RAF Maintenance Units (now called Supply Depots) were responsible for receipt of equipment from manufacturers and its storage until required by Squadrons and other units. When no longer required by such units, their equipment was returned to the appropriate Maintenance Unit. After the war this was returned at such a rate that the massive Maintenance Units could no longer cope and in consequence took under their wing a number of non operational aerodromes in order to use them in a storage capacity

During 1947 – 48 the No 25 Maintenance Unit Hartlebury, Worcestershire, had under their control the aerodromes at Harrington, Chelveston and Diss in Norfolk and into these a stream of Bedford lorries and Queen Mary low loaders delivered equipment until all suitable buildings were filled to capacity.

According to Colin Colleyshaw, the officer commanding at Harrington during this period, manning at Harrington were 40 airmen, 2 Corporals, 2 Sergeants, 1 civilian Clerk of Works and 1 Officer in charge. Quite a bit different to when it was an operational airfield during the war, then there were over 3,000 American servicemen on the base.

After the initial receipt of equipment from units closing down it was essential to classify it into equipment required by the RAF for future use, or equipment surplus to requirements which could be sent to the auctions being held at that time.

Gradually, as surplus equipment was auctioned, storage capacity in the Maintenance Units returned and equipment could be re-shipped to them and the sub-sites, as the aerodromes were called, were de-requisitioned and returned to farming, though in some cases retaining their runways and buildings for a number of years.
Although the airfield at Harrington again fell into disuse and had been returned to farmland, it received a new lease of life when it was selected to become one of the RAF’s Thor missile sites in the late 1950’s.

Three rocket launch pads, which still remain, with ancillary buildings were constructed. The whole area, being declared top security, was fenced off and floodlit. The IRBM WS-315A Thor missile system had a range of 1,500 nautical miles. The 60 ft long Thor missile was powered by a 150,000 lb thrust rocket engine fuelled by liquid oxygen and RP-1, a light cut petrol, and carried a 2 Megaton thermonuclear warhead. Deployment of these missiles commenced in December 1958 and was phased out in 1963 with the advent of the manned V-bombers, the Valiant, Vulcan and Victor, along with an increased threat to fixed installations due to the improved accuracy of Soviet missiles.

org_b14eca0f543f16af_1494149180000_zpsihqblzoq.jpg


org_b6e52c84c845dea4_1494148524000_zpsgddgfxla.jpg


org_f5365fe92138955e_1494148503000_zpsc3if4hoz.jpg


org_3d1c974526dba6bd_1494148441000_zpsvje9oipd.jpg


org_ca245e18fd20a55b_1494148091000_zpsqmz4o8bu.jpg


org_cbf8c75d62b87d13_1494148093000_zpsmflb61qh.jpg


org_893cfa676c2925c1_1494149354000_zpsxsbwob14.jpg


org_8915ed29a5df856a_1494149309000_zpsn6ntngdg.jpg


View attachment 728667

org_f3fc6c0370989609_1494147974000_zps6ekoh2p6.jpg


org_804323860b4840cb_1494147969000_zpsuntvctkf.jpg
 

A man called Martyn

28DL Full Member
28DL Full Member
Nicked intel and no boots on the ground. Sorry...that's a fail.
Then I'm sorry you feel that way. As I've quoted from the Harrington museum website and acknowledged the source of the information, I fail to see your insinuation of plagiarism. Others on this forum routinely quote from Wikipedia for example. I myself quote from Wikipedia for my thread on RAF Fauld, you commented on that thread. but didn't you try to haul me over the coals then, so why now?
It does seem very inconsistent on your part.
As for your point of "no boots on the ground" ?
My camera was 380ft up in the air and attached to my drone. while my boots were very firmly on the ground as I made my way around the site. I thought that the use of the drone would provide a very different take on the site.
 

HughieD

28DL Regular User
Regular User
I was having a bit of a joke (it's a military base right) but you've taken it a tad too seriously....
 

Camera Shy

Old enough to know better
Regular User
I do like seeing some drone stuff but to be fair, it's a few pics of some grassy fields and some concrete.
 

The Lone Shadow

Industrial Fanatic!
28DL Full Member
Pure airstrike! That is how all military activity happens these days... Boots on the ground are a thing of the past
 
Top