Thanks and the only thing I can think why it wasn't approved is because of the history but I have don't know any as its no where to be found all I know its a WW2 bunker
Ok if you need it spelling out -
The thread title must consist of the name of the site, the general area and month and year of your visit. "Manchester underground bunker" isn't sufficient.
The wonky, poorly lit images do not make for good viewing. A bit of effort with the photography goes a long way when putting a report together. If it's possible, get back and take a bit of time to get some better photos. They don't need to be professional quality or anything like that, but just take your time to get them as good as you can manage. Also some of the images were repeated.
The lack of history is fine if you really can't find anything, but provide as much of the info you do know so others have something to go on. Many of our members are quite proficient in finding out information about places and will be able to fill in your blanks. However, the more you can provide the better, so provide a bit more of a specific location, for example, and maybe some info on how you came to find the place, etc.
If you're really struggling with info maybe start a thread in the Advice and Info forum with a couple of your pictures and all the info you know, asking if anyone knows the piece. It's likely someone will respond with all the details you need.
However, as it stands it doesn't cut it as an acceptable location report.
